Greg Hanson, consulting researcher for the Feinstein International Center.
The work is an update of an earlier study on perceptions of humanitarian action in Iraq, which was part of the Humanitarian Action 2015 program. The report draws upon five years of active monitoring in Iraq and the region, a relatively long period in which agencies have had many opportunities to adapt to a difficult context. The report argues that despite some improvements in security for Iraqis, the ability of the international community to provide for the most vulnerable is impaired by the continued politicization of humanitarian response and systemic deficiencies in coordination mechanisms. The report concludes the both the UN system’s integrated mission approach and the UN’s relatively risk-averse security model have hampered the efficiency and effectiveness of the overall humanitarian response. Areas are highlighted where there are opportunities for improvement.
The study echoes the findings of a parallel study on Afghanistan to be released shortly.
Download the report from the Tufts website.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment