- One piece of news: a useful summary of today's meeting in Montreal of governments involved in the response.
Below are more technical pieces from the humanitarian blogosphere (and yes I did just use that phrase). Enjoy:
- Quite a bit of comment on the Lancet article condemning the aid effort as self-serving and uncoordinated. Michael Keizer agrees that some points have a grain of truth, albeit unsupported by evidence, (the comments repay the reading on this one); Alanna Shaikh (humanitarian uber-blogger with a big following) weighs in; Brendan Gormley is covered in a Guardian profile following the very strong DEC response to the article; and a frazzled response straight from Haiti here.
- Dan Smith of International Alert looks at what's next for Haiti, recovery and the humanitarian caseload and the IntLawGrrls look at future administration possibilities
- Paul Currion argues that reinventing Haiti really means reinventing the systems in which the country exists, as well as internal infrastructure
- Peter Daou asks why we can't mobilise the same outpouring of aid and compassion for comparable numbers of people affected by sexual violence in the Congo
- Newsweek gives a view on the historical background to the earthquake in Haiti
- An old hand expresses disappointment with the media coverage of the response
- And an absolutely fascinating bit of advice for the military supporting the operation from a retired Marine Corps officer - sample quote:
'Your job is to try to get Haiti back to something approaching the way it was seconds before the quake struck. If the President wants you to do nation-building, he’ll let you know.'
I think the summary missed the point of my post, so I must have not been clear enough. Let me clarify.
ReplyDeleteI agree (I would not use the word 'concede' in this context) with The Lancet that more scrutiny of the aid sector would be a good thing; however, apart from their obvious choice of rhetoric over content, I also show that the article has serious evidential and conceptual issues.
And yes, I agree about the comments.
Thanks for posting Michael - sorry for my truncated summary. I've amended it above.
ReplyDelete