Read more on the ODI website.In a recent position paper MSF posed itself the question “…. what will better serve the populations in need: will MSF’s independent approach be beneficial to the most vulnerable at the end of the line? Or on the contrary, …is it indeed the collective effort, which will better serve the vulnerable?”
We came to the conclusion that the best service for populations in need will come as a result of independence of action rather than participation in an integrated effort. Hence our decision in the past years to decline the invitation to join the IASC both at headquarters and field level, to withdraw from SCHR and not to join clusters, meanwhile keeping an open and bilateral channel of communication with all major aid actors.
Just one more example of MSF isolationism and arrogance, or is this the only way of ensuring impartial provision of humanitarian assistance to populations at risk?
Friday, September 14, 2007
ODI Online Exchange: Yet another arrogant move? MSF’s stance on its relationship with the rest of the international aid system
Eric Stobbaerts of MSF recently posted a piece on ODI's Online Exchange forum.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment