Thursday, February 25, 2010

SCHR: Updated position paper on civil-military relations

SCHR have revised and updated their position paper on Civil Military relations, first written in 2001 and updated in 2004, and have produced a very readable survey of the state of the debate. The paper:
'...looks primarily at how SCHR agencies consider relations with armed forces in situations of armed conflict, or natural disasters taking place in contested environments. This paper contributes to the current debate on humanitarian-military relations and fosters a better understanding of the respective roles and the necessity for humanitarian actors to commit to the positions elaborated herein. It is intended to inform and guide the internal policies and practical guidance of SCHR agencies.'
Read more on Reliefweb.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Getting into aid work: dos and don'ts for internships for organisations and hopeful entrants

I'm about to leave my first (or second, depending on how you count it) job at a large humanitarian aid organisation after three years. In that time I've had many conversations about the rights and wrongs of internships - whether or not they are useful, for the organisation and the individual; who benefits the most; whether they are ethical.

Then the other day, this article surfaced on my Twitter feed, arguing that making internship a critical element of getting into politics effectively restricts the field to the affluent. Hmm, I said. Same thing in aid work - you have to be young and unencumbered, or you can't do the internships and low-paid admin jobs that get you your first 'proper' job. Understandably, I got called on it - it is possible to get field-work positions which enable you to live a fairly nice lifestyle even at a low level. But when I'm talking about is pretty much the standard route recommended to many eager graduates from degree courses on aid and development in the UK, even by me. What follows is a personal take on this route, the pros and cons, and how to make it the best experience it can be for both aid agency and willing skivvy.

Why do an internship?

It's true, it's the best starting point I know of, barring outrageous luck or the money and chutzpah required to move out to Country X, and bang on doors until someone gives you a job because you're there and it's easy. The other alternative, by the way, is to get qualified as an accountant or a logistician or an engineer or a plumber and then work your way across laterally. But I'm assuming you're me, three years ago - newly graduated, with a theory-focussed degree under your belt and a headful of critical questions and fascinating debate, but no experience.

What an internship won't do: get you into the field. It's not magic. It will not of you an experienced aid worker make. It is the red pill that keeps you inside an aid agency office long enough to work out what happens there. Play your cards right and an internship, ladies and gentlemen, will get you your first admin job in an aid agency. This, by they way, is the way to get into aid work. It's unfair and a scandalous waste of your brilliance, but there it is.

Make the most of it:
  • At interview, if the tasks aren't clear from the outset, clarify what you'll be doing. A good internship will mean you're treated like an employee - you should have a line manager and regular one-to-ones. Push to have specific projects, something you can stick your name on and put on your CV.
  • Be realistic - organisations need extra pairs of hands for what can be totally naff jobs. Suck it up, Princess. You can learn from almost any working experience, be it organising lunch for a meeting or event (ask to sit in the corner! offer to write up the note!), going through boxes of old papers (pinch unwanted articles and books!), analysing data (a vital skill) and writing summaries of programmes.
  • Many internship schemes offer proper training, including inductions on the organisation structure and ethos. Take advantage of this. Understanding the basics of the humanitarian aid system, such as the difference between international organisations, NGOs, and the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement makes you sound professional and knowledgeable and can make a real difference later. And first aid training is always handy. Grab it with both hands.
  • Similarly, take advantage of any opportunity you have to learn. You can't fail to pick up terminology and an understanding of how things work on the ground (i.e. what you can't get from a degree) if you keep your ears and eyes open and read every document that passes through your inbox whether it's relevant to your duties or not. Focus on real narrative accounts of programmes: evaluations, trip reports, and the like, rather than strategy or policy documents - they might give a bigger picture but on their own they won't give you anything you can't get on the internet.
  • That said, be informed. Find out which geographical and thematic areas are key for your adopted organisation and start following relevant news on IRIN and Reliefweb. A scan of the headlines and reading one or two articles in the morning will do wonders for your knowledgeable expression at team meetings. The more savvy you seem, the better the work you'll get.
  • Apropos: lingo matters. Acronyms and buzzwords are the curse of every industry but they are crucial to your credibility. Understand the org chart and the shorthand people are using and it will gain you respect.
  • Make contacts and use, but don't abuse them. It's great to have the organisation on your CV and someone with a proper job title to put down as a referee (don't forget to ask!). But don't abuse it - regular emails asking for work will put people off. You want them to remember you if you ever go back to them for a job, and not in the bad way.
  • If you see an opportunity to apply for an admin role within the team or the wider organisation, do go for it. The path of least resistance is very attractive to agencies who are always under tremendous pressure, and someone with experience of the organisation who can start immediately will often trump someone who might beat you to the job on an equal footing. Make no mistake - the admin job is the first step towards something meatier.
  • While you're at it, get some experience of travel in developing countries. It won't make you employable on its own, but it does show passion and interest and is the only argument I can think of for the sort of paid volunteering scheme Alanna Shaikh rightly despises. When the time comes for you to apply for support jobs where you'll be more involved with programmes, it'll show that you're competent and safe to travel in difficult places.
Agencies - don't be evil.

Interns are good cannon fodder, it's true - free and fifty of them queuing out the door for every job. But they are people too, so be nice:
  • Do a proper advert and recruitment process. Good practice, good experience for them, and you will get the cream of the crop. On spec CVs and people's friends' children might be good, but opening it up to the field means you'll get someone great.
  • Make it possible for people without a trust fund. Pay reasonable travel and lunch expenses, and don't require full-time hours and extended commitments. A three-day week for three months is absolutely do-able even for London - you can cover your three unpaid days with four days of bar work and still pay the rent for three months.
  • Build a job description around general support and admin (and be clear about this at interview), but add one central project they can get their teeth into and include on their CV. As long as they knew what they were getting into, it's fine to give them administrative and repetitive work. The intern should be aiming for an admin job in the sector, so they will need to prove they can do this kind of work.
  • Don't use them for the wrong jobs. If you have an endless procession of interns doing mapping and coordination work, say, others in your workplace will get frustrated that their are continually briefing beginners, and you'll be missing an opportunity to give something meaty to your admin staff, who (make no mistake) know the place backwards.
  • Admit them to organisational induction programmes and normal training and learning events - inexpensive and a good perk for the intern.Make sure they know exactly who their line manager is, and make them approachable. Managing interns is a good fillip for first- and second-jobbers too, as it adds personnel management to their list of experiences. But do the odd review yourself so you know how the relationship is going.
  • Finally, a pet hate. Some organisations have rolling internships for support jobs which other organisations would run as a permanent position. This isn't fair to the project or the people. If there are real responsibilities and long hours, and they'll be in trouble if they don't deliver, it's a salaried role.
So what did I miss? Any other tips and rants, leave them in the comments and we can all have a row about this.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Web101: RSS Feeds

I know you love this blog. Here you are, after all. You may picture me slaving over a hot laptop all night, scouring the internet for all this fun stuff... but no. In fact, the news is delivered to my laptop as it's published.
RSS (Really Simple Syndication) is a format for delivering regularly changing web content. Many news-related sites, weblogs and other online publishers syndicate their content as an RSS Feed to whoever wants it.

RSS solves a problem for people who regularly use the web. It allows you to easily stay informed by retrieving the latest content from the sites you are interested in. You save time by not needing to visit each site individually. (WhatisRSS)
There are two options for how to use them every day:
  1. Bookmark a feed, either in your bookmarks toolbar or your normal bookmarks folder, so you can glance at the list every now and then, or
  2. Use an RSS feed reader like Feeddemon (PC), NetNewsWire (Mac), Reeder (iPhone) orViigo (Blackberry). These options allow you to download your feeds ahead of time, browse articles wherever you are, and save any you want to go back to later.
Here's my magic bumper humanitarian policy fun feed to get you started. Enjoy!

WEF proposes 'new vulnerability and protection business model'

From the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council on Humanitarian Assistance:
The first requirement of this new business model is a comprehensive risk framework. We often find ourselves having to engage in an enterprise of risk management with incomplete information about how things will unfold. Such uncertainties are only being exacerbated by the impacts of climate change. We must plan to be ready for events for which we cannot plan.
The second requirement is to rework the balance between crisis response and the upstream and downstream issues of prevention and recovery. More resources are needed both to reduce risk in the first place, and reduce the risk of relapse after a crisis occurs.

The default mode of the current humanitarian model in general is external assistance; the default mode of a new vulnerability and protection model should be self-reliance. The third requirement of this new model is to enhance the capacities, readiness and resilience of exposed societies so they can better handle extreme events. Ensuring that civil society and local communities are involved will not only make response efforts faster, but more efficient as their involvement will make it possible to identify and meet the diverse needs of various groups in affected communities, groups differentiated, for example, by gender, age, and social class.

The fourth requirement is to engage the private sector more fully, not just as a source of donations but also as a source of key skills and technologies, during and after crises. We commend the World Economic Forum’s initiative on the private sector in humanitarian relief as well as other efforts to incentivise appropriate and beneficial private-sector investments in risky regions.

The fifth requirement of the business model is to link the humanitarian concern to broader development issues, strengthening social safety nets and supporting resilience. This requirement will necessitate unprecedented collaboration between humanitarian and development actors and interests.

Finally, as cross-border challenges will grow, regional organisations backed by the UN will need to be able to mediate and mitigate these problems as they arise.
Download the full report.

Global Humanitarian Assistance: Update February 2010

GHA have released an update on their GHA report. The series aims to
present simple and objective statistical information on humanitarian financing for people involved in humanitarian aid policy, programming and performance. The goal is a shared evidence base that people can use in their planning and policy work to ensure better outcomes for the women, men and children whose lives are affected by humanitarian crises.

UPDATED: Tufts/HFP: Humanitarian Horizons - a practitioners guide to the future

UPDATED 18.02.10: IRIN highlights guidance on responding to urban emergencies:
Other than urban earthquake preparedness, humanitarian agencies have not yet focused on emergency response in urban centres. The authors of the guide offer tips to humanitarian agencies in this new environment:
1) Programming has to shift from being rural-focused, so humanitarians will now have to reach out to urban planners for effective urban programming

2) Build a knowledge base identifying the differences between urban and rural programmes

3) Re-identify and reprioritize groups most at risk

4) Use of technologies such as cell phone banking and microcredit to deliver aid in an urban context

5) Ensure the creation of better linkages between city and town authorities, and strengthen delivery systems
The blurb:
The Guide "is an attempt to help humanitarian aid agencies look a generation into the future to begin making the necessary changes now to their thinking and organization, to ensure that they continue to deliver the right assistance and protection to the right people in the right ways.

The Humanitarian Horizons project is a futures capacity-building initiative intended to assist the humanitarian sector prepare for the complexities of the future by enabling organizations to enhance their anticipatory and adaptive capacities. Launched in October 2008, the project builds on HFP's analyses of changing dimensions of future crisis drivers, and makes more practical the exploratory futures research conducted under the Feinstein Center's 2004 Ambiguity and Change project.'
Read on! at the Tufts website.

CRED: Disaster data for 2009

In 2009, 328 natural disasters were recorded in the EM-DAT database. They killed more than 10 thousand people, affected nearly 113 million others and caused almost 35 billion US$ of economic damages.

No mega-disasters occurred in 2009, the event ranking highest in death toll being the earthquake in Indonesia on September 30 which killed over 1,100 people, followed by a series of typhoons and floods that caused many deaths, making Asia once again the most affected continent. In fact, six of the top ten countries with the highest number of disaster-related deaths were in Asia. However, when looking at the top 10 countries in terms of number of deaths per 100,000 inhabitants, the Islands of Samoa, American Samoa and Tonga topped the list.

Compared to previous years (2000-2008), there is a reduction in 2009 in disaster mortality with 10,443 killed, which is below the annual average of 85,541; as well as the number of affected, with 112.8 million compared to the annual average of 230.4 million. In terms of economic impacts, disasters costs were also below the 93.8 billion 2000-2008 annual average and were mainly attributed to winter storm Klaus which hit France and Spain in January (5.1 billion US$), the L’Aquila earthquake in Italy in April (2.5 billion US$) and a tornado in the United States in February (2.5 billion US$).
Read more on Reliefweb.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

ALNAP: posted Guide to Real-time evaluations of humanitarian action

This pilot guide is intended to help both evaluation managers and team leaders in commissioning, overseeing and conducting real-time evaluations of humanitarian operational responses. Drawing on a synthesis of existing good practices, it is intended as a flexible resource that can be adapted to a variety of contexts.

This guide concentrates on RTEs undertaken in first phase of an emergency response – where the RTE fieldwork takes place within a few months of the start of the response. This is because such RTEs pose particular problems for both the evaluation manager and the evaluation team. RTEs that take place later on in the response are closer to ex-post humanitarian evaluations, but this guide also addresses how such RTEs can feed into ongoing operations.

The focus of this guide is therefore on what is distinctive about humanitarian RTEs. It does not offer advice on evaluation methodologies in general, but on specific aspects of methodology which make RTEs unique and different. Nevertheless some of the advice will apply to all evaluations and not just to RTEs. This is motivated partly by the authors’ observations of areas of weakness in existing evaluations.

Download the guide on the ALNAP website.

IRIN: Afghanistan: A tight squeeze on humanitarian space

“In the south, south-east and east, isolated reports were received regarding government officials being forced to bribe insurgent commanders in order to facilitate the continued operation of schools and allow for the implementation of certain development projects. This highlights the heightened ability of the insurgents to exert their authority and influence over the implementation of development activities,” the UN Secretary-General said in a report to the Security Council in December 2009.

Laurent Sailard, director of ACBAR, a consortium of over 100 Afghan and foreign NGOs, said aid workers must not make payments to insurgents for security, access or safe passage.

“Buying a passage for humanitarian convoys or access is a bad strategy with long-term negative impacts. Demands could increase, and if not satisfied could lead to increasing threats. It is a never-ending process that always leads to the worst,” he said, adding that aid workers had to ensure access and security through acceptance among local communities and impartial dialogue with belligerent parties."
Movement policy is not to use armed escorts but gain access by negotiating and being accepted by all parties to a conflict.

Read the rest of the article on the IRIN website and read more on the Movement's position here.

Tufts: Humanitarian Horizons: A Practitioners’ Guide to the Future

The Guide merges the projections of global change highlighted by four earlier research papers, with the futures perspectives of operational agencies. The result is an attempt to help humanitarian aid agencies look a generation into the future to begin making the necessary changes now to their thinking and organization, to ensure that they continue to deliver the right assistance and protection to the right people in the right ways.
Download the Guide from the Tufts website.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

FT: Syrian economy risks wilting in severe drought

A drought in Syria has ‘drastically effected’ 1.3m people in the rural north and north-east of the country, according to a UN report. Despite government attempts to downplay the problem, 40,000-60,000 families have been forced to migrate.

Read more on the FT website.

UNHCR: Safeguarding humanitarian space

Nonetheless, not all humanitarian actors are in agreement that humanitarian space is in fact shrinking. During the Cold War many conflict-affected areas (such as parts of Afghanistan, Angola and Mozambique) were off-limits to aid workers. The diversion and manipulation of aid has also been a perennial feature of the operating landscape. What has changed is the nature of the challenges to principled humanitarian action, underpinned by significant shifts in the global political and security context.
Read more on Reliefweb.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

UPDATED for 2010: Humanitarian trends and futures

The Ministry of Defence's Global Strategic Trends Programme has published their biannual survey. It's pretty pessimistic stuff, but there's a good executive summary.

For completeness, here's last year's list of trend-scanning papers and places that caught our eye:

Updated: ALNAP State of the System report is out

Bringing together much of the work done by ALNAP since the tsunami, this first pilot report provides a baseline and working methodology which will be built upon and improved in subsequent iterations.
Download the report from the ALNAP website. Although there is an excellent executive summary, a quick run-down of the key points follows in the full post.

Aims of the report: Provide a system-level mapping and assessment of international humanitarian assistance over the last two years according to key criteria. Includes new, previously unavailable descriptive statistics and highlights some new initiatives in policy and practice.

Areas of focus: Operational performance of the ‘formal international humanitarian system’, focussing on emergencies involving international agencies and an appeal for international assistance. Limitations: did not eventually cover national, local and community-based organisations and does not measure beneficiary-level impacts.
Key findings:
  • the international system has grown in staff size by an average annual rate of 6% over the past decade, and has reached a population of roughly 211,000 humanitarian workers in the field.
  • In 2008, some $6.6 billion was contributed by donors directly to international emergency response efforts, and the combined humanitarian expenditures of aid organisations on overseas programme activities totalled around $12.8 billion.
  • In terms of performance, findings indicate an overall positive trend in areas having to do with the internal workings of the humanitarian system – such as coordination mechanisms, funding vehicles and needs assessment tools – while at the same time some fundamental issues, such as leadership and the system’s engagement with and accountability to beneficiaries, remained weak. The findings thus depict a system steadily and incrementally improving its own internal mechanics and technical performance, while remaining deficient in some big picture requirements for effectiveness.
Findings against the OECD DAC review assessment criteria:

Coverage/sufficiency: still insufficient as despite growing sector and rise in funding, needs have also gone up. Nonetheless coverage is improving over time - over 85% of total stated requirements met in 2007 and 2008, compared with 81% in 2006 and only 67% in 2005. Declining in some contexts due to insecurity or host government restrictions. In the most contested environments, insecurity for aid workers has increased markedly.

Relevance/appropriateness: Quality of needs assessments still seen as a weakness, but have improved with a majority of respondents reporting adequate inter-agency needs assessments in their contexts and wider breadth of types of programming improving flexibility. However evaluations and beneficiary consultations show common instances of multiple assessments without sufficient follow-up. Beneficiaries continue to be inadequately consulted and involved in assessments and subsequent programme design. Prioritisation is improved but may be proliferating with too many parallel processes appearing.

Effectiveness: Responses are more timely thanks to significant agency investment in standby capacity and new mechanisms (e.g CERF). Growing attempt to better link humanitarian and development actors with disaster risk reduction (DRR) efforts and to increase investments in DRR. Overall, coordination seen to improve with introduction of Cluster Approach and positive views about the value of clusters outnumbered negative ones. But leadership was a noted weakness - the Humanitarian Coordinator (HC) system needs strengthening. Other coordination trends highlighted included a growing role for regional bodies (e.g. ASEAN) and agency consortia. Monitoring identified as a continuing weakness. HR improvements (in capacity, quality, and professionalism) were encouraging but Many agencies made real efforts to increase investment in operational capacity and quality of human resources. Improvements in professionalism of humanitarian staff noted, but high staff turnover and a need to invest more in national staff development. There are also growing capacities on the part of national governments to meet the needs of their own citizens in times of disaster in many contexts, which requires greater consideration in advance of launching response efforts.

Connectedness: An unmitigated scarcity of investment in local and national capacities was a repeated theme, as were concerns with the top-down tendencies of the system and the risk of undermining local capacities. However, there are also signs of improvement in how international agencies work with local humanitarian actors, with the survey finding a majority of respondents felt efforts at capacity building had increased in the past two to three years. A clear momentum around need for greater downward accountability and participation, and a growing number of examples of investments in feedback and complaint mechanisms and greater transparency, which benefits programmes.

Efficiency: Efficiency issues, including the risks of corruption, continue to be relatively neglected in literature/evaluations of humanitarian action, although Transparency International is developing an anti-corruption toolkit. -Widespread concern about overhead and programme support costs, particularly in relation to new financial mechanisms. People also noted, however, that constant drive to minimise administrative costs was leading to chronic under-investment in key capacities that could serve to improve performance. Arguably too great a focus on driving down admin costs.

Coherence: focus on: i) whether core humanitarian principles, international humanitarian law (IHL) and refugee law were being respected in humanitarian programming - a real challenge with a noted lack of respect for IHL and the principles in many recent conflicts and integrated or 'whole of government' approaches threatening humanitarian space - both requiring renewed advocacy efforts and more principled action by agencies, and ii) consistency in objectives and actions for protection and for advancing the crosscutting issues of illness, age, gender and disability which are hard to keep sight of once 'mainstreamed'. Improved guidance and awareness but confusion about the concept of protection and who has responsibility. There has been criticism of the quality of protection work, including the deployment of inexperienced staff, breaches of confidentiality of affected populations and inconsistent knowledge and application of relevant laws.

If you read one thing this week: excellent summary of Dead Aid

If anyone, like me, has been curious about the kerfuffle raised by Dambisa Moyo's book on ODA, 'Dead Aid', but not sufficiently time-rich or interested to read the whole thing, then take two minutes to digest this very useful summary. Excellent for bumping up your conference small talk.

iRevolution: The Role of Live Skype Chats in the Disaster Response in Haiti

Fascinating post for the geekily inclined, or those interested in how we're using Skype in emergencies and general communication.

Ben Ramalingam's new blog: aid on the edge of chaos

Ben of ALNAP fame now writes a blog in a personal capacity which has grown out of his forthcoming book on complexity science and aid. He kindly flagged this article, which looks at the intersection between natural disasters, and socially constructed patterns of vulnerability. This work can be applied in examining colliding trends and patterns to try to better predict and prepare for disasters.

Enjoy!

Transparency International: Preventing Corruption in humanitarian operations

Preventing Corruption in Humanitarian Operations: A Handbook of Good Practices offers a menu of best practice tools for preventing and detecting corruption in humanitarian operations that includes ways to track resources, confront extortion and detect aid diversion. The handbook, part of TI’s broader work to stop corruption in humanitarian assistance, covers policies and procedures for transparency, integrity and accountability, and specific corruption risks, such as supply chain management and accounting.
Download the handbook using the links above.

Monday, February 1, 2010

UPDATED 01.02.10 Afghanistan: The London Conference and Yemen meeting

This post will be updated as new news comes in.
  • 01.02.10: Final bit of analysis from Daniel Gerstle at Change.org
  • 01.02.10: Afghan women urge NATO to remain in Afghanistan long enough to ensure that the Karzai administration will not fall to the Taleban
  • 01.02.10: Fuller statement from the UK Government now available on Reliefweb.
  • 28.01.10: Analysis and predictions of a new settlement which will bring the Taleban into government in Afghanistan. Much disquiet from human rights groups and other commentators at the prospect of rehabilitating perpetrators of human rights abuses.
  • 27.01.10: Reuters reports on the Yemen meeting today, apparently hastily called after a Yemen-based terrorist group claimed responsibility for the failed Christmas US plane bomb. Apparently:
  • Wednesday's meeting, which brings together the Group of Eight world powers, Yemen's neighbors in the Gulf Cooperation Council, as well as Egypt, Jordan and Turkey, is designed to give a strong signal of support to Yemen, while pushing for economic development and reform. The European Union, United Nations, World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) will also be represented.
    Given the attendees and stated focus, this seems a very Washington Consensus approach - no sign that the plight of the displaced in Yemen will be discussed.

  • 27.01.10: Seven NGOs reiterate the negative impact of the militarisation of aid in Afghanistan and urge the London Conference to rethink the increasing tendency of international foreign policy to link development and security activities
  • 27.01.10: ICRC urges all parties to work to minimise the impact of conflict in Afghanistan on civilians
  • 26.01.10: IRIN: Humanitarian aid is not something the military can do
  • 26.01.10: ICRC describes Yemen as 'a serious humanitarian crisis in the making'
  • 25.01.10: Don't forget Yemen - an additional meeting will be held on Wednesday. Alertnet looks at possible outcomes of both conferences.
  • 25.01.10: Reuters reports on the draft communique on the future of Afghanistan which includes 'a "framework" for turning the country's security over to Afghan forces' beginning this year, commits Afghanistan to setting up 'an organization to "reach out to insurgents," and the international community to ...channeling more of their aid through the Afghan government and providing debt relief to Kabul.'